Category Archives: Players Perspective
Snap Back?
For several years, tennis players have been told that some string material will “snap back” during impact with the tennis ball, creating an additional rotational force on the ball. This may be true for some period in some cases, but what if the string does not “snap back”?
Now what?
If this happens to you, we suggest you do not move the string!
The string is in this position because your stroke sent it there! It just didn’t snap back.
This lack of snap-back creates a very nice string spacing that allows the ball to have greater intrusion into the string bed, more dwell time, and possibly more rotation.
This client strings his racquets frequently due to tension loss that may lead to what we see here. If you want to, or need to, continue playing with this racquet as you see it, try it without moving the string back into position.
Where is my power?
Tennis players want power, control, spin, comfort, durability, and fun!
Well, so do we!
We collect data to contribute to your greater enjoyment of tennis, so we are including this video to address some questions about power!
Because we do not know how you are swinging the racquet, fast, slow, or in between, we must rely on data (numbers) to help us help you.
Players Please…Part Two
Racquet Quest, LLC is for players!
Players’ input helps shape what we do. Now, we would appreciate your help in focusing on what you need, whether you’re a player, parent of a player, coach, or enthusiast.
Racquet Quest evaluates, tests, and reports on anything we can verify.
The Racquet Quest YouTube Channel is a way you can see and hear what we are doing and how it can affect you. So, please spend about 18 minutes with us!
Head Extreme Pro 2024 Custom Demo Setup
We encourage all of our clients who are trying new racquets to have one of their “finalists” setup they way they will be using it.
| Manufacturer | Head |
|---|---|
| Racquet Model | Head Extreme Pro 2024 |
| Reference Tension | 60 |
| String | VS16 / ALU 115 |
| Machine Used | True Tension Pro |
| String Bed Stiffness - RDC | 55 |
| String Bed Stiffness -FlexFour | 61.8 |
| String Bed Stiffness - SBS | 50.6 |
| String Bed Stiffness - ERT | 35 Kg/Cm |
| Racquet Flex, RDC | 64 |
| Racquet Flex, FlexFour | 50.6 |
| Racquet - In Plane Stiffness | 448.7 |
| Weight, Grams | 334 |
| Weight, Ounces | 11.78 |
| Balance, mm | 319 |
| Balance, Inch | 12.56 |
| Length, Cm | 68.6 |
| Length, Inch | 27.00 |
| Head Width | 9.55 |
| Head Length | 12.89 |
| Head Area, cm2 | 623.9 |
| Head Area, Sq. Inch | 96.7 |
| Beam Height @ Grip, mm | 20.5 |
| Beam Height @ Mid, mm | 23 |
| Beam Height @ Tip | 22 |
| Beam Width @ Grip, mm | 14.5 |
| Beam Width @ Throat, mm | 13 |
| Beam Width @ Mid, mm | 11.5 |
| Beam Width @ Tip, mm | 13.3 |
| Number of Main Strings | 16 |
| Number of Cross Strings | 19 |
| Ratio | .624 |
| Main String Grid Inch/mm | 7.21/183.1 |
| Cross String Grid Inch/mm | 9.63/244.6 |
| Density (% of head filled with string) | .716 |
| Average Cross String Space | .507 |
| Average Main String Space | .451 |
| Dynamic Tension, Kp, ERT | 35 |
| Dynamic Tension, Lbs/in | 195.8 |
| First Moment, Nm | .816 |
| Polar Moment | 336 |
| Torsional Stability | 15 |
| Swing Weight, Kg/cm2 | 321 |
| Swing Weight, Ounces | 11.32 |
| Swing Weight Calculated | 339.9 |
| Power, RDC | 50 |
| Control, RDC | 50 |
| Manueverability, RDC | 73 |
| Power, Calculated | 2006.7 |
| Head Points | 7.56 |
| Head Weight, % | 46.5% |
| Center of Percussion | 21.2 |
| Dwell Time, ms | 6.31 |
| Efective Stiffness - lbs | 29.6 |
| K, Lb/In | 195.8 |
| Recoil Weight | 163.1 |
| Twist Weight | 228.7 |
| End Weight | 141.1 |
| Tip Weight | 191.8 |
| 9 O'Clock | 93.2 |
| 3 O'Clock | 90.6 |
| Butt End | 150.3 |
| COF, Main | .372 |
| COF, Cross | .336 |

Racquet Quest, LLC


