Category Archives: head

Head Auxetic 2 Radical Team 2025

By now, you have probably seen the latest Radical series, which is very hard to miss. If you haven’t seen them yet, here is a peek at the “orangiest” of all racquets! These racquets look great and are perfectly matched to the Radical branding.

This review is of the Head Auxetic 2 Radical Team 2025, the lightest of the series with a 102-square-inch head.

Head Radical Team

When examining the following specifications, pay attention to the racquet’s stiffness. This flex may mitigate power but will open up a great combination for a player looking to take more control of the game.

The string we chose for this racquet is Ashaway Dynamite Natural 17 gauge (the color is a bright green, not natural). The material is PEEK fibers with a rough braided outer jacket, presenting a lovely COF if you care about these things.

The Radical has always been a great performance racquet, and this 2025 series is no exception. Come by the World Headquarters, get a demo, and tell us what you think.

 

 

ManufacturerHead
Racquet ModelHead Auxetic 2 Radical Team 2025
Reference Tension56
String
Dynamite PEEK Multi
Machine UsedTrue Tension Pro
Static
String Bed Stiffness - RDC45
String Bed Stiffness -FlexFour57.7
Strig Bed Stiffness - SBS34.0
String Bed Stiffness - ERT32
Racquet Flex, RDC60
Racquet Flex, FlexFour34
Racquet - In Plane Stiffness421.8
Weight, Grams301
Weight, Ounces10.62
Balance, mm330
Balance, Inch12.99
Length, Cm68.6
Length, Inch27.008
Head Width9.83
Head Length13.12
Head Area, cm2653.2
Head Area, Sq. Inch101.3
Beam Height @ Grip, mm22.5
Beam Height @ Mid, mm24.7
Beam Height @ Tip22.8
Beam Width @ Grip, mm12./6
Beam Width @ Throat, mm12.5
Beam Width @ Mid, mm12.6
Beam Width @ Tip, mm12.8
Number of Main Strings16
Number of Cross Strings19
Ratio.631
Main String Grid Inch/mm7.25/184.2
Cross String Grid Inch/mm9.69/246.1
Density (% of head filled with string).671
Average Cross String Space.493
Average Main String Space.453
Dynamic
Dynamic Tension, Kp, ERT32
Dynamic Tension, Lbs/in178.9
First Moment, Nm.768
Polar Moment316
Torsional Stability15
Swing Weight, Kg/cm2300
Swing Weight, Ounces10.58
Swing Weight Calculated327.8
Power, RDC43
Control, RDC57
Manueverability, RDC87
Power, Calculated 1840.7
Head Points4.09
Head Weight, %48.1%
Center of Percussion21.0
Dwell Time, ms6.98
Efective Stiffness - lbs25.7
K, Lb/In144.2
Recoil Weight142.9
Twist Weight217.2
End Weight 116.3
Tip Weight 183.8
9 O'Clock85.4
3 O'Clock86.2
Butt End128.8
COF, Main.494
COF, Cross.388

 

Linearity…again.

A Long Head Gravity Tour 98

As a high performance racquet technologies business, we have requests for everything imaginable, some not so imaginable! Long racquets are at the top of the list.

Full Custom Head Gravity Tour 98!


Here is a review of a Head Gravity Tour 98 2025 SMU that is 27.75 inches long/70.485cm. See if you can determine which property is most affected by the length.

You can see the string properties here as data taken on our Questron.

ManufacturerHead
Racquet ModelHead Gravity Tour 98 2025 SMU
Reference Tension57

String
MonoGut ZX Pro
Machine UsedTrue Tension Pro
Static
String Bed Stiffness - RDC52
String Bed Stiffness -FlexFour61.0
Strig Bed Stiffness - SBS50.6
String Bed Stiffness - ERT37
Racquet Flex, RDC58
Racquet Flex, FlexFour43
Racquet - In Plane Stiffness429.5
Weight, Grams335
Weight, Ounces11.82
Balance, mm331
Balance, Inch13.03
Length, Cm70.5
Length, Inch27.756
Head Width9.86
Head Length12.71
Head Area, cm2633.6
Head Area, Sq. Inch98.2
Beam Height @ Grip, mm21.3
Beam Height @ Mid, mm21
Beam Height @ Tip21.5
Beam Width @ Grip, mm10.5
Beam Width @ Throat, mm10.6
Beam Width @ Mid, mm10.8
Beam Width @ Tip, mm12.2
Number of Main Strings16
Number of Cross Strings19
Ratio.650
Main String Grid Inch/mm7.72/196.1
Cross String Grid Inch/mm10.25/260.4
Density (% of head filled with string).785
Average Cross String Space.546
Average Main String Space.464
Dynamic
Dynamic Tension, Kp, ERT37
Dynamic Tension, Lbs/in206.94
First Moment, Nm.858
Polar Moment362
Torsional Stability18
Swing Weight, Kg/cm2344
Swing Weight, Ounces12.13
Swing Weight Calculated367.0
Power, RDC49
Control, RDC52
Manueverability, RDC57
Power, Calculated 2096.5
Head Points6.77
Head Weight, %47%
Center of Percussion21.44
Dwell Time, ms6.492
Efective Stiffness - lbs27.42
K, Lb/In166.67
Recoil Weight167.7
Twist Weight242.8
End Weight 131.6
Tip Weight 202./6
9 O'Clock94.7
3 O'Clock94.9
Butt End144.5
COF, Main.339
COF, Cross.300

Let’s Look at a Hybrid Graph

A client asked, ” Would putting natural gut in the cross string instead of the main string create a softer string bed?”

That question is the precursor to the graph below, so I will let the video tell the story.

This graph does not reflect the stiffness of polyester string.   So, in any format, a natural gut may help soften the string bed if polyester is used.

This data is