Category Archives: IsoSpeed
Play Better Longer
For many years, we have been testing all racquets for string bed stiffness, effective stiffness, flexural stiffness, Â in-plane stiffness, and about any other stiffness you can imagine.
Throughout this process, we were also testing the strings for power potential, creep, string-on-string friction, and linearity.
Linearity is a significant property of string; however, it does not get the attention we believe it deserves. Â So, this little post will begin to change that. Â We will start with some images and explain what we see in them.
Four different string materials are represented here from left to right:
- RPM Blast
- IsoSpeed Polypropylene Composite
- Babolat VS Touch Natrual Gut
- Ashaway MonoGut ZX Polyether ether ketone (PEEK)
The entire chart is important, but the real property we are interested in for this post is “linearity”.
- Linearity is how straight the plot is from the beginning to failure.
- Failure is the vertical line associated with each string material.
A glance will show MonoGut ZX with the longest linear track, however, Babolat VS Touch is the very “straightest”, followed by IsoSpeed and RPM Blast.
OK, but why do we care? Â We care because when we say a string will play better longer, it is based on the linearity which is the property directly related to consistency.
Better predictability = better performance
Players perceive predictability more than raw stiffness.
A string that ages predictably plays better longer, even if it’s not the softest or most powerful.
That’s it!
Now all we need to do is quantify “better”.
I will leave that up to you.
Is this a cost effective alternative?
Everyone loves natural gut but not everyone loves the price, even though it is very much worth it!
You may think ” I will just use synthetic gut it must be about as good”. Â Nope, not even close. Â However there is string that may be close enough to consider as an alternative.
One such string is IsoSpeed Professional. Â Because we know “a picture is worth a thousand words” here is a picture:
If you are serious about playing tennis at a high level for a long time please consider an alternative to a string that does not help that effort.
This is one, however there are others that we will highlight in future posts.
Yonex V-Core 100
The Yonex V-Core is a great opportunity to review the racquet with IsoSpeed Professional 17 gauge string. If you know anything about the racquet you will know it is a great platform for many player types.
But what about IsoSpeed strings? These strings, and there are a series of them, are unusual in the material and construction, therefore not very well considered!
The string is polypropylene fibers bonded together then stretched and packaged on a stiff molded reel to retain some of the stretching.
If you have seen our previous review on our Questron data you will notice some similarity to natural gut.
| Manufacturer | Yonex |
|---|---|
| Racquet Model | Yonex V-Core 100 |
| Reference Tension | 55 |
| String | IsoSpeed Professional 17 |
| Machine Used | True Tension Pro |
| String Bed Stiffness - RDC | 41 |
| String Bed Stiffness -FlexFour | 53 |
| String Bed Stiffness SBS | 48.6 |
| String Bed Stiffness - ERT | 31 Kg/Cm^ |
| Racquet Flex, RDC | 66 |
| Racquet Flex, FlexFour | 48.6 |
| Racquet - In Plane Stiffness | 423.7 lbs/In |
| Weight, Grams | 321 |
| Weight, Ounces | 11.32 |
| Balance, mm | 324 |
| Balance, Inch | 12.76 |
| Length, Cm | 68.8 |
| Length, Inch | 27.08 |
| Head Width | 9.87 |
| Head Length | 12.82 |
| Head Area, cm2 | 641.3 |
| Head Area, Sq. Inch | 99.4 |
| Beam Height @ Grip, mm | 22 |
| Beam Height @ Mid, mm | 25.6 |
| Beam Height @ Tip | 25.5 |
| Beam Width @ Grip, mm | 16.3 |
| Beam Width @ Throat, mm | 15.2 |
| Beam Width @ Mid, mm | 10.3 |
| Beam Width @ Tip, mm | 11.6 |
| Number of Main Strings | 16 |
| Number of Cross Strings | 19 |
| Ratio | .649 |
| Main String Grid Inch/mm | 7.50 / 190.5 |
| Cross String Grid Inch/mm | 10.15 / 257.8 |
| Density (% of head filled with string) | .747 |
| Average Cross String Space | .529 |
| Average Main String Space | .461 |
| Dynamic Tension, Kp, ERT | 31 |
| Dynamic Tension, Lbs/in | 173.4 |
| First Moment, Nm | .800 |
| Polar Moment | 328 |
| Torsional Stability | 15 |
| Swing Weight, Kg/cm2 | 313.0 Kg/Cm^ |
| Swing Weight, Ounces | 11.094 |
| Swing Weight Calculated | 337.0 |
| Power, RDC | 58 |
| Control, RDC | 41 |
| Manueverability, RDC | 78 |
| Power, Calculated | 2073.9 |
| Head Points | 5.98 |
| Head Weight, % | 47.2% |
| Center of Percussion | 21.1 |
| Dwell Time, ms | 7.31 |
| Efective Stiffness - lbs | 25.3 |
| K, Lb/In | 131.4 |
| Recoil Weight | 154.2 |
| Twist Weight | 233.8 |
| End Weight | 130.7 |
| Tip Weight | 188.4 |
| 9 O'Clock | 90.5 |
| 3 O'Clock | 89.4 |
| Butt End | 140.2 |
| COF, Main | .392 |
| COF, Cross | .321 |


Racquet Quest, LLC


