Category Archives: String
All string information
As tennis players, you must constantly ask “what’s the difference” when it comes to tennis racquets and string! Well, as racquet technicians we ask the same questions!
This post is intended to showcase the differences of string in testing, not playing, however, some of the data may be noticeable to the player in certain situations.
What this graph shows us, in addition to our trying to save a tree by printing on the back of previously used paper, is that each of these stings will provide almost the same performance. This is indicated by the curve and how closely related the strings are.
The differences you do see here can be attributed to the gauge, or diameter, of the string, with the largest diameter (Tour Bite) having the highest tensile strength. Down in the “hitting” displacement range (way below the 39.9mm!), there is very little difference.
The tensile strength can be a factor as the string begins to “notch” or otherwise come apart. Each of the strings in this graph is monofilament so notching would be the failure mode in a racquet.
Head has introduced a brand new racquet! So, you say, what’s new about that they do it every year! Yes, but this is a different racquet!
This is the Boom!
In all the years we have been dealing with Head it has become clear that they are not averse to making new things…instead of drastically changing old things.
The Boom is available in a Pro version and a MP version, with the Pro version being a little heavier.
So the Boom, which will be available in January of 2022, (pre order now!) is a new racquet and it is not shy about it!
The head shape is a little different, the shaft is a little different, and the Auxetic material and construction is a little different and all these “littles” add up to a totally different hitting experience!
The shaft transitions from a common box to a trapezoid as it junctions with the yoke (which is the Auxetic area, don’t forget)
The 24mm beam (actually 22, 24.4, 23.3) is a solid choice for advancing players offering just the right amount of stiffness for a little extra “punch”.
We believe the recoil weight could be higher and that is easily accomplished when wanted.
|Racquet Model||Head Boom MP 2022|
|Reference Tension||55 lbs - 24.9 kg|
|String||Tecnifibre BiPhase 124|
|Machine Used||True Tension Professional|
|Racquet Flex, RDC||62 - After stringing|
|Racquet Flex, FlexFour||42.0|
|Racquet - In Plane Stiffness||344.8 lbs/Inch|
|Head Area, cm2||639.4|
|Head Area, Sq. Inch||99.1|
|Number of Main Strings||16|
|Number of Cross Strings||19|
|Main String Grid||7.61|
|Cross String Grid||10.68|
|Density (% of head filled with string)||.774|
|Average Cross String Space||.475|
|Average Main String Space||.562
|Dynamic Tension, Kp, ERT||35|
|Dynamic Tension, Lbs/in||195.7|
|First Moment, Nm||.807|
|Swing Weight, Kg/cm2||312|
|Swing Weight, Ounces||11.01|
|Swing Weight Calculated||342.2|
|Head Weight, %||47.7%|
|Center of Percussion||20.80|
|Dwell Time, ms||8.58|
|Efective Stiffness - lbs||29.1|
It is said that “a picture is worth a thousand words,” which may be true as long as the picture tells a story.
This story is about natural gut string, and the pictures will show what we can achieve, informationally, with our testing equipment. The two (2) strings are Babolat VS Touch 17 and Luxilon Natural Gut 125.
Our Questron software scales the images to suit the data so the graphs will not be the same size.
Our testing loads the string from 0 pounds force to 50 pounds and back to zero then up to 50 pounds three (3) times. This is the “stress/strain” curve. Fifty (50) pounds is arbitrary and because we are using the same methodology for all string materials it is a good number. The closer these lines are together the better.
The farther it takes to reach 50 pounds the “higher elongation” the string is. In this case it is about 44mm.
The important property of this string is the linearity! That is the “straightness” of the line from beginning to end. This indicates predictability, stability, and consistency.
This picture tells us the tensile strength and the knot strength. In this case the knot strength is 52.3 pounds and takes a stretch to very close to 60mm before failure.
What is, probably, the first thing you notice about this “picture”? Could it be the squiggly lines? What could be causing this?
We believe it is the “break-in period” players associate with Luxilon gut! We have heard it from the players but have not been able to “see” it! It could be the bonding agents realigning as the load is applied.
You will notice a couple of things: the similarity of the “stress/strain” curve and the displacement to “knot strength” of the two strings. This string will feel a little less “soft” than the Babolat VS Touch 17. The linearity is quite good up to failure.
So, based on these pictures, could you make a recommendation? If so, let us hear them!
The winner is Tecnifibre MultiFeel 17!
This string, MultiFeel, is a very “soft” polyurethane bonded construction that offers playability and a good value!
This graph shows the high elongation and nice elasticity of this string. The fairly linear slope up to failure would indicate some consistency of shot all the way up to breakage!
The knot strength is pretty good for a thin multifilament and we can say from experience that the know is going to be fine when property “tightened” and large enough to not slip bak into the grommet barrel.
If you are considering a multifilament this would be a good one to try!
Head FXP is a string that seems to be largely overlooked and I am surprised after seeing the results of the installation and testing!
|String Name||Category||Gauge||Ultimate Tensile Strength/Lbs||Knot Strength/Lbs||Country of Origin|
|Head FXP||Multifilament - Nylon||17||165.9||93.4||Japan|
Both the tensile strength and knot strength are exceptional and the graph shows that this string is very “elastic” which is a good thing for tennis racquet string but sometimes just not considered.
The area under the solid red lines is considered a stress-strain curve and indicates the “elasticity” of string by how close the lines fit from 0 to 50 three (3) times. A perfectly elastic material would be one line even though it went through three (3) cycles. What you see here is quite good and one of the reasons it is the winner!